Take the 2-minute tour ×
Martial Arts Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students and teachers of all martial arts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I need to know the real and original history of goju-ryu karate. In other words, I need to find why this style of karate was introduced. I am a goju player, this is what I know:

Goju is specially developed to fight in small places like boats and places with very less space, and it is specially developed for Japanese naval soldiers, thousands/hundreds of years ago. The reason for goju is, when a naval fleet is under an attack of enemies, shotokan karate did't help them because it uses lot of space. So, goju was introduced and developed in two versions. One is for places with less space and another one is for normal land fights. They can switch to these versions by changing the main stance.

This is what I know.

Have you heard the same or something different? Is it true that goju-ryu karate was developed specifically for use by the Japanese navy, hundreds or thousands of years ago, as an alternative to Shotokan karate?

share|improve this question
2  
I've never heard that said about goju ryu. –  Dave Newton Jun 10 '12 at 4:59
3  
This is markedly different from the history documented in Wikipedia: Goju Ryu. You will find a lot of similarities between Shotokan and the hard parts of Goju - they effectively have the same roots but Shotokan was adapted to better suit large scale teaching on mainland Japan. –  slugster Jun 10 '12 at 5:11
1  
I don't trust wikipedia on this Because my master is from one of best karate universities in Japan, and he is a very known student of the Grand master.. And my question is about the original history, why goju is born. Apart from that even though these 2 styles are some what same, there main deference is 50-50. Which means goju player only give the full power to arms/legs only when the opponent is about to get hit. But shotokan player is always with 100% power, which make them tired easier compared to goju. –  Sepala Jun 10 '12 at 5:17
2  
@Sepala You are correct that you should never absolutely believe Wikipedia, but there are a whole lot of citations for that article which does make it more accurate. It also roughly tallies with what I was told before the WWW or Wikipedia were big, so it is a fairly standardised history. Is it possible your master has an incorrect interpretation, or are you suggesting there is a "secret" history? "Ideal for use on boats" is quite different to "invented for use on boats". –  slugster Jun 10 '12 at 5:37
2  
I've definitely never heard that. That some of its early history includes a Crane-style gong fu would seem in direct contradiction, too. There are some Chinese arts that were specifically optimized for close-quarters combat, but I'm not aware of anything similar on the Japanese side. (This in no way means there haven't been, though.) –  Dave Newton Jun 10 '12 at 16:26
show 6 more comments

1 Answer 1

First, we must understand what it means to "create" a style: someone learned martial arts from someone else, perhaps several someones, fought a little in competition or in the street, made some changes to what they were taught, and gave it a name. We're not talking about wholesale development of a military training program, enlisting experts from multiple fields for the express purpose of covering certain topics. So right off the bat we should be dubious of claims that "this style was designed to fight on rice paddies" or "this style is for the Navy". Those are usually just myths.

Chojun Miyagi

Goju-ryu became goju-ryu when Chojun Miyagi had to register the name of his art with the Dai Nippon Butokukai. Prior to that, it was referred to by the general terms for karate of the time, such as as te, ti, or toudi, or by its "village art" name, Naha-te, after the city of Naha.

Kanryo Higaonna

Miyagi learned from Higaonna (aka Higashionna), whose teacher is under dispute. Much of the stories we tell about him are oral histories, which is to say, totally made up in some parts. He studied in China as well as in Okinawa, and synthesized aspects of both traditions in what he taught. It is likely that what he learned had some roots in Crane styles.

Further back

It is total folly to try to determine lineage of goju-ryu further back than Higaonna, that is to say, no one has done so with any degree of certainty or evidence. Considering that he was alive from 1853 to 1916, and that even he didn't call his style goju-ryu, it is totally unfounded to say that goju-ryu is "hundreds" or "thousands" of years old. That is plainly false.

I recommend not listening to "just so" stories about the origins of styles and techniques. "The northern Chinese kick more" and "Naihanchi is for fighting on rice paddies" are after-the-fact rationalizations for the origins of things we simply don't know. If one is looking for truth (as opposed to feeling good due to the camaraderie of hearing dojo myths), it is a much better idea to look at history and research.

Think critically: what decade are we talking about, where anyone would seriously care about unarmed hand-to-hand fighting on boats? World War Two, when Shotokan and Goju-ryu were actually recognized styles? In the 1920s, when Funakoshi and Miyagi started teaching? Any intimations of the sort are better chalked up to martial arts politics, where a style is given official designation, used primarily for bragging rights.

Charitable interpretations

At best, we could say that Goju-ryu might be better suited for close-quarters combat than some other style, such as Shotokan. This could be true.

share|improve this answer
    
I know this reply is after a long time, but, I agree with your last sentence. Close combat, specially when not enough room –  Sepala Sep 13 '12 at 17:32
    
@Sepala To be clear, my statement doesn't at all mean that Goju is ideally suited for close-quarters combat. (I'd trust judo or Greco-Roman wrestling more.) I'm just saying that goju could be better than a style that trains at long range exclusively. –  Dave Liepmann Sep 13 '12 at 17:45
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.