Is there a difference between the two terms form and sequence in martial arts?
|
migrated from english.stackexchange.com Oct 25 '12 at 5:22
|
If you look at the forms tag you'll notice it's description is
An important word here is 'traditionally'. A form is not only a method to teach and learn a particular technique, it has also been used to preserve and pass on a proven technique in a formal and systematic manner. The word sequence is used in martial arts as well (just search this site), but then it refers to a set of movements, not necessarily being a form. Note that the term most people use in martial arts is the Japanese word 'kata', the Chinese 'taolu' or the Korean 'hyeong' or 'poomse', depending on the origin of the art one practices. |
||||
|
|
|
A form or kata is a set sequence of moves, always performed the same way. Obviously you can also have a sequence (or combination) of moves that are not a form/kata, however in my (limited) travels I have never heard the word However there are literally millions of variations in styles and arts out there, who's to say someone hasn't started using the term in a formal way, or possibly that the word used in one of the more esoteric styles doesn't translate to English literally as 'sequence'? |
|||
|
|