Take the 2-minute tour ×
Martial Arts Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students and teachers of all martial arts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is Systema a modern version of Pankration? The ancient style is very loose in the rules. Except that for Systema, there are weapons included, it is also quite loose in restrictions and practical for serious combat.

Are all styles with few rules going to be similar to each other?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 4 down vote accepted

No

Pankration is an ancient form of fighting in competition. Participants wrestled, hit each other as hard as they could, choked each other, broke each others' fingers and other bones, and generally put a beating to each other in a manner similar to modern no-holds-barred matches. (Note the subtle difference between NHB and MMA--it's the difference between UFC 1-15 and UFC in the era of the Unified Rules.) Fighters often competed in both pankration and boxing. (Boxing, also, was a rather different and more brutal sport at the time.)

Systema is a modern martial art that involves little or no sparring until advanced stages of training. It involves no wrestling per se, no boxing per se, and competition is rarely or never emphasized. This is a fundamental departure from sparring- or competition-based training like Pankration or MMA.

The two are only alike in that they are both martial arts. They barely share any similarities beyond that.

share|improve this answer
    
Systema Wrestling. You're confusing training methodology with combative sports. The contact is anything but light. Visit a few systema classes. –  stslavik Mar 23 '12 at 18:34
    
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, that was part of my point. As I understand it, and from my very limited experience, most Systema classes do not involve hard sparring or wrestling. (Contact within the context of drilling doesn't count.) If I'm wrong on that particular point--if Systema classes frequently involve hard sparring--then I would be wrong. –  Dave Liepmann Mar 23 '12 at 18:42
    
In my experience you are wrong. While you may start light, an eventual progression to harder training is inevitable. –  stslavik Mar 23 '12 at 18:44
    
Training or sparring? –  Dave Liepmann Mar 23 '12 at 18:46
    
Sparring and training. The strikes are extremely dynamic. Usual caveat applies of course: Good instructor equals good training. The art itself dictates the curriculum, it's up to the instructor to teach it. Other caveat: my training was in Systema Ryabko. –  stslavik Mar 23 '12 at 20:19

Keep in mind Pankration maybe used in competition but the competitions are still fought on Marbel floors in Ancient Greece! Pankration is still commonly labelled as the deadliest form of martial arts in the world the kicks are meant to break ribs, the grappling moves are meant to break bones or at least dislocate and break tendons.

Pankration is not a competition sport similar to MMA. The form taught for competition is the same one as used by both Greek special forces as well as an optional advanced forms in US branches of the military. Look up the Marines vs the Army Pankration matches.

share|improve this answer
    
Could you provide some references for your claims? –  Sardathrion May 1 at 10:52
    
I was not aware that MMA kicks weren't designed to break ribs! Nor that grappling moves in MMA weren't designed to break bones and rip soft tissue! –  Dave Liepmann May 1 at 11:41

Is Systema a modern version of Pankration?

Interesting, but no.

Pankration is a modern martial art recreation of an ancient combat sport introduced in the Greek Olympics in 648 BC which combined grappling and striking.

Systema (by which I'm going to make an assumption that you're referring to Systema Ryabko [Система Рябко], as taught by Vladimir Vasiliev, or Systema Kadochnikova [Система Кадочникова, or its better-known-in-the-United-States off-shoot, Systema Spetsnaz (Система Спецназ)]; I can think of half a dozen to a dozen other styles from the former Soviet Union that are called Systema), is derived from a number of different traditions, including folk wrestling traditions, as well as Cossack warrior traditions.

One fundamental difference is that Pankration (as practiced nowadays) is a combat sport, where Systema (as defined above) is a system of combat designed for military use. While Pankration may have few rules, it does, at its core, have rules.

Are all styles with few rules going to be similar to each other?

Unfortunately, when you look at the big picture of all arts, they're still fundamentally tied to the artists using them: we all have human bodies, and thus are restricted to human body movements. In this way, the broad strokes of all martial arts will always appear the same to a person with little or no experience in them.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.