New answers tagged

0

There are fortunately not enough deaths in boxing (about 10 per year) to tell one way or another, hence no statistical correlation. People consistently underestimate the importance of sample size requirements in statistics. If the sample size is too small, that's the end of the discussion, as far as statistics are concerned, because any apparent ...


1

Is there any reason to believe that Ingle's fighters do better than average in avoiding serious, lasting damage from injuries in the ring? I wouldn't say so. The "hit and get hit" isn't a mantra that is NOT widely taught in boxing. Everybody aims to do this, just in different ways. Some are, obviously, better at it than others though. The style of f.e. ...


-4

I really doubt there is any correlation here. But furthermore it is important to notice that correlation does not imply causality and as as example you can see impressive correlations here



Top 50 recent answers are included