It's well understood that you need some carbon to get well tempered steel, and put flex into the blade for durability. (Brittle swords break easily.)

But is there any use of the flexibility inherent in swords?

  • Does blade flex have any function beyond durability?

In most cases, sword flex is only for the sake of durability and excessive flexibility is likely to interfere with doing proper damage with your blade. A major exception is the urumi, or "whip blade", where that flexibility is used to use it as more of a "soft weapon", able to make more use of centrifugal momentum and to curve around defenses.

As discussed here and in other parts of the Internet, the flexible blades you see in Chinese martial arts demonstrations and in movies are not historically correct, and are built that way entirely for visual appeal and for a lighter blade for faster movements.

Here's a video where Ramsey Dewey expounds a bit more on the subject.

Lastly, while it's a bit of an edge case, fencing foils are relatively flexible compared to most sword blades. This is primarily for the sake of durability and safety, but since all that is required is a touch (legacy of when this was an honor duel), the "flick" method is sometimes used to let the flexing tip strike around a guard.


There are two types of steel, hard steel and soft steel.

The purpose of hard steel is edge retention. The purpose of soft steel is absorbing shock. The purpose of blade flex is so the sword does not shatter on the first strike.

Here's the most basic thing about swords, ANY SWORD, no matter the culture. When they hit too many hard things, they stop being sharp. In movies, those photogenic edge-to-edge sword fights make swords appear indestructible, it's good drama. IN Reality a fight with blade on blade action quickly turn any razor-sharp blades into nothing more than a glorified stick. After a few sword strikes, chips and damage will occur and ruin the blade. That's why Japanese sword smiths devote especially extra attention to sharpening blades. But if the sword cracks extend past the core, if the cracks are sufficiently deep the sword is ruined forever and typically has to be reworked or recycled. Real sword fights focus on parrying, diverting or stopping blade strikes or with the non-sharp end being struck. Lots of antique samurai swords have strike marks on the opposite side. European sword fighting focus on thrusting, rarely slashing (less the opponents are unarmored), by the 14th Century AD, Plate armor was abundant on the battlefield rendering slashing techniques largely outmoded without heavier swords (falchions, etc)

Modern manufacturing and steel made from billet, has taken most of the guess work out of sword making. Making a sword from scratch is difficult. Making a sword from billet, is a lot easier. The Laminate sword making is the art of folding layers to make an intermixed series of layers of hard and soft steels offering flexibility and edge retention. The Japanese did sword folding by virtue of their terrible furnaces. They used smithing, because they could not achieve the temperatures needed to purify the steel to desired characteristics so they beat it into submission. If you have good quality steel, you don't have to fold anything. Japans first steel swords go back to the 5th century AD, Europe had steel for 1100 years prior, they used laminate folding six centuries before Japan. Then abandoned the technology for a better process, "Spring Tempering" which produced "Spring steel" which is phenomenally better.


Although blade flex's primary role is durability, preventing the sword from bending/shattering/otherwise breaking...

There is another benefit

A certain degree of blade flex will also make cutting easier, because your blade alignment doesn't have to be perfect. This can be seen in test cutting, especially in slow-motion. More flexible swords (like tulwars/pulwar, Grosses Messer, etc.) are generally easier to cut with than stiffer ones (like a Katana).

As with everything everything, there is a happy medium to this property. To illustrate this, think of a sword coming down at some angle (not 90 deg) at a surface.

Too much flex causes the edge to flex when encountering a surface. The out-of-cutting-plane forces bend the blade (so it is no longer aligned with the force of the cut) and results in a shallow or no cut. Think about trying to cut with a piece of paper held on the far edge. It bends before it can do any damage.

Too much stiffness and your entire blade turns as it cuts. Those out-of-plane forces have to go somewhere: the stiffness means the forces result in movement, turning direction of the cut. You'll need to apply a counter force (specifically, a torque or moment, but let's not be pedantic here) or the blade will be stuck, deformed, or deliver a shallow cut. This just makes cutting harder- more force needed or smaller acceptable cut angle!

So having a happy medium is important here. The correct degree of flex allows the out-of-plane forces to bend the blade, allowing the blade continue in the direction of the cut, while minimizing the twist from an off-nominal cut. This happy medium means it's easier to deliver a good cut.

As always, other factors apply, including edge geometry, sharpness, blade cross-section, force applied (drawing/pushing/hewing), and the target itself.

  • I think this has more to do with blade geometry - a Katana has a rather tick spine, therefore is stiff. My razor blade is so thin that i can flex it with my thumb nail, but it's, well, razor sharp. – Klaus Kuplen Feb 8 at 21:04
  • @KlausKuplen Certainly edge geometry is important (I tend to not cut my self on smooth, round objects)! Edge geometry and stiffness (which derives from material and blade cross section) are all major factors to cutting. I'll update this answer with more reasoning. – PipperChip Feb 9 at 14:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.