7

I'm a BJJ praticioner trying to improve my takedowns. I was wondering: is Obi Tori Gaeshi just a variation of Sumi Gaeshi, or a different takedown? The two are quite similar, with little differences.

I searched them on Google, but I've found images that look like Obi Tori Gaeshi named as Sumi Gaeshi. I'm confused! Could someone give me some enlightenment?

| improve this question | |
  • 1
    Obi-tori-gaeshi was historically considered a variant of hikikomi-gaeshi by the Kodokan. In 2017, during the most recent revision to their technique list, it gained its own separate classification. The previous classification of this throw as a variant of hikikomi-gaeshi (as opposed to sumi-gaeshi) is somewhat arbitrary - it has points in common with both (as detailed in the quotes in mattm's answer). – brazofuerte Jun 20 '19 at 9:20
9

I take Toshiro Daigo's book Kodokan Judo Throwing Techniques to be the official word on throw classification. Daigo is the chief instructor at the Kodokan, the mother school of judo in Tokyo, Japan.

obi-tori gaeshi (sutemi version) is hikkikomi gaeshi

The top player in the lightweight class was a man named Stepanov, who inflicted pain on many Japanese judoka, with ashi-tori-waza from Sambo Judo, and unorthodox techniques such as obi-tori-gaeshi.

The technique, in which he gripped the back of the opponent's belt and dropped down the rear, has long been called obi-tori-gaeshi, but is in fact the hikkikomi-gaeshi described in sono ni.

"Sono ni" is the second variation/point of the section on hikkikomi-gaeshi, where an over the back grip is taken on the belt.

Obi-tori-gaeshi is now on the list of now 68 Kodokan-recognized throws as a te-waza. See john's answer for description and video.

Differences between hikkikomi-gaeshi and sumi-gaeshi

Daigo explicitly enumerates points that differentiate variations of hikkikomi-gaeshi and sumi-gaeshi, so you are in good company regarding the confusion between the techniques.

  1. Without over the back grip:

    The key point in telling these techniques apart lies not in the part of uke's leg that tori springs upwards, but in whether he executes the technique from a defensive grappling posture (sumi-gaeshi), or executes it while holding one of uke's arms (hikkikomi gaeshi).

  2. With over the back grip:

    The key point for telling these techniques apart lies in whether tori grips uke's back (sumi-gaeshi) or whether he grips the back of uke's belt (hikkikomi gaeshi).

Judo throw classification is a messy business. Throws may have different names at different times, and the points of classification can be quite arcane and perhaps not useful. The difference between sumi-gaeshi and obi-tori-gaeshi is not something I actually remember, but I know where to look it up. I would not expect most instructors to know or care about this difference.

| improve this answer | |
3

Obi-tori-gaeshi is a Kodokan recognised technique. It is a te-waza (hand technique). You grasp uke's belt and leg and rotate towards the belt-hand side (clockwise if you're right-handed) while lifting uke's leg.

Hikikomi-gaeshi is a ma-sutemi-waza (forward sacrifice technique). There are two variants:

  • one where you roll backwards
  • and one where you twist underneath

See this clip from the Kodokan Judo Throwing Techniques video on the difference between the two.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    I would like to suggest two improvements to this answer: First, while Obi-tori-gaeshi is not part of the Gokyo (neither the original one from 1895 nor the revised one from 1920), it is indeed a te-waza technique recognized by the Kodokan. Secondly, while you are (apart from the first point) correct, I would suggest this source - the official Kodokan website - where you can also find my first point validated. Welcome to MartialArts.SE! – Philip Klöcking Sep 1 '18 at 10:33
  • Fascinating. Kodokan Judo Throwing Techniques is out-of-date with respect to the Kodokan website. – mattm♦ Sep 1 '18 at 12:01
  • 1
    @mattm: Curiously enough (and maybe in part explaining it), the IJF - other than the Kodokan Institute - does not know this difference. So it probably comes down to academic dissence within Judo politics here. I can see how Kodokan's Obi-tori-gaeshi should be considered a technique of its own, though. – Philip Klöcking Sep 1 '18 at 12:57
  • 1
    @PhilipKlöcking I did not know IJF has its own classifications! That really should not surprise me; where people can bicker about something they will. – mattm♦ Sep 1 '18 at 13:07
-2

If you want to improve this kind of throws, have a look at the book Fighting Judo by Katsuhiko Kashiwazaki (no longer in print and it's a second-hand collector book now but you can find it online). I am sure you will love it as a BJJer.

Kashiwazaki is a lightweight judoka, 1981 judo world champion & 1975 sambo world champion (!) and technical beast on the ground. So his repertoire is pretty about throws with easy transition into ground techniques.

"Russian" judo is (was because of rules changes) a lot about wrestling moves and sacrifice throws and its no coincidence if sambo is very much alike (after all, it's another sport that is 80% old judo and some Russian judo champions are samboists wearing a judogi ;) ). So have a look at sambo too!

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    It would help more if you shared how the book addresses his question. – Macaco Branco Nov 28 '18 at 3:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.